✦ AI Training Data Services

Expert AI Training Data

for Frontier Model Development

Your AI model is only as good as the data it learns from... delivered by senior engineers who understand the code they're evaluating.

SCROLL
✦ The Challenge

The Expert Bottleneck

High-quality AI development is hitting a wall: the quality of human feedback. Standard crowd-working platforms fail when tasked with evaluating complex system design, deep reasoning, or multi-repo architecture.

Nomos Insights bridge the gap. We replace generalist labelers with Domain Expert Engineers who don't just follow a rubric they understand the underlying engineering complexity.

Non-atomic rubric criteria that conflate multiple concepts
Cascading failures from dependent rubric clauses
Golden answers that penalize valid alternative approaches
Difficulty miscalibration: hard tasks that are just long
Inconsistent quality across annotators and tasks
1,000+
Expert-Reviewed Tasks
Across eval, annotation & benchmark creation
5
Programming Languages
Java, Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, C++
4+
Platform Partnerships
Mercor, Alignerr, Turing, and Micro1
9+
Senior Engineers
Competitive programmers with production experience
✦ Our Services

Four Ways We Help
AI Labs Build Better Models

From evaluation dataset creation to reasoning annotation and agentic benchmarks, delivered by engineers who genuinely understand the code they're reviewing.

01

Coding Evaluation Dataset Creation

We create complete evaluation task sets (prompt, golden answer, and rubric) designed to test model reasoning on non-verifiable coding challenges involving multi-file contexts, architectural decisions, and real-world complexity.

Original prompts across Architecture & System Design, Code Debugging & Repair, PR Triage, and Root Cause Analysis
Expert-level golden answers representing senior engineering standards
Atomic rubrics calibrated for 40–70% pass rates on critical dimensions
Tasks across Java, Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and C++
JavaPythonTypeScriptRubric DesignEvaluation
02

Reasoning Trace Annotation

Closed-source models don't expose their internal reasoning. We reconstruct and annotate missing thought processes by reviewing agent trajectories on SWE-bench-style tasks derived from real open-source repositories.

Annotated trajectory files with clear, first-person reasoning at each decision point
Reasoning anchored to task context: explaining why, not just what
Tight, refined annotations for messages with partial explanations
Full review of multi-turn flows including context, tool calls, and outputs
SWE-benchTrajectoriesAgent ReasoningAnnotation
03

Agentic Benchmark Design

We create benchmarks that evaluate the entire problem-solving process. Not just whether a model produces correct output, but whether it understands requirements, asks the right questions, and follows sound engineering practices.

Task creation from real GitHub issues and pull requests
File alignment verification across prompts, interfaces, requirements, and test patches
Grading rubrics covering functional correctness, robustness, code style, and trajectory quality
Baselining through AI agent solving to validate task feasibility
GitHub IssuesBenchmarkTest FairnessGrading Rubrics
04

RLHF Data & Model Evaluation Support

Beyond task creation, we support the broader training data pipeline with expert feedback workflows: preference data collection, adversarial testing, and quality assurance on existing datasets.

Response ranking and preference data for reinforcement learning
Expert review and correction of model-generated code
Red-teaming and adversarial prompt testing for coding assistants
QA audits on existing evaluation datasets to catch rubric violations and scoring inconsistencies
RLHFPreference DataRed-TeamingQA Audits
✦ How We Work

Structured Delivery,
Built for Fast-Moving Projects

Four clear stages, each with defined outputs: from initial scoping to scaled delivery.

01

Scope & Align

We start by understanding your evaluation framework, target model capabilities, language and category requirements, and quality standards. We integrate seamlessly into existing platform workflows.

02

Execute with Rigor

Our engineers produce tasks through structured creation workflows with built-in review cycles. Every prompt, golden answer, and rubric is reviewed against our quality checklist before submission.

03

Iterate on Feedback

We incorporate reviewer feedback rapidly, whether from your internal team, external reviewers, or automated quality checks. Our iterative refinement process is designed for the fast-paced cadence of AI training projects.

04

Deliver at Scale

With a dedicated team of 9+ engineers, we maintain consistent throughput across concurrent projects without sacrificing quality. We operate across overlapping time zones with most US and European clients.

✦ Why We're Different

Engineers Evaluating Code.
Not Annotators Labeling It.

We write code. We don't just label it.

Most AI training data providers recruit annotators and train them on coding guidelines. We start with competitive programmers and senior engineers, then apply that expertise to evaluation tasks. The difference shows in rubric quality and reasoning depth.

We've done the hard quality work already.

Through 1,000+ tasks, we've built internal standards that catch subtle issues most teams miss: non-atomic criteria, rubrics that create unfair cascading failures, golden answers that penalize valid alternative approaches.

An engineering team, not a staffing agency.

We're a cohesive team with shared context, established review processes, and institutional knowledge from hundreds of completed projects. Not individual freelancers matched to tasks.

A Market Shifting Toward Expert-Level Data

The AI training dataset market is projected to grow from approximately $3.5 billion in 2025 to over $16 billion by 2033. As frontier models shift from simple data scaling to post-training techniques where human feedback quality matters more than volume, the demand for expert-level training data is accelerating faster than the supply of qualified providers.

That's exactly where Nomos Insights fits.
✦ Ready to Talk?

Whether You're an AI Lab or
a Platform Partner

Whether you're an AI lab looking for a direct engineering partner, or a platform like Mercor, Turing, or Alignerr looking for a high-quality execution team, we'd like to hear about your project.